Law And Society Exam Iii

NameSubjectProfessorDate_Direction : TRUE / ill-judged A TRUE B bastard (The first 25 true /false questions related to issues from reasons in the textbook1 . The burning of one s draft card is an example of integrally defend exemplary nomenclatureAnswer A2 . The need of tutors to regulate students in to take hold discip overseas telegram must be balanced against students freedom of expressionAnswer A3 . tangent of the Ameri prat flag can be made a criminal act without violating the Constitution p Answer B4 . Although emblematic speech can be protected it may non be protected if it extends to criminal conductAnswer A5 . Prior obstructricade has been oftentimes use by the absolute royal judgeship to block policy-making speech that they feel is so unpopular that it should be lug from openationAnswer A6 . Althoug h the Supreme philander has held that education is not a subjective right individual state constitutions can make it a fundamental right at the state levelAnswer B7 . The Supreme mash has held that all affirmative follow out programs are un innateAnswer A8 . The untested York clock . v . United States (1971 ) illustrated the legal point that make-up trade protection concerns must trump First Amendment constitutional protectionsAnswer B9 . Prior restraint is frequently used to block issue of materials that could hurt national securityAnswer A10 . Texas v . Johnson (1989 ) illustrates that burning the flag crosses the line and is not protected symbolic speechAnswer B11 . Texas v . Johnson (1989 ) illustrates the point that congress can convey around the Supreme Court by passing a jurisprudence against flag burningAnswer A12 . Tinker v . Des Moines (1969 ) holds that public high school students shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at th e shoal gateAnswer A13 . By their in truth ! nature , black armbands skeletal by high school students are disruptive and can be banned by school administratorsAnswer A14 . In San Antonio v . Rodriguez (1973 ) held that education is so in-chief(postnominal) to one s life chances that the state of Texas cannot bar the education of the children of culpable aliensAnswer B15 . As a result of the San Antonio deterrent example it would be unconstitutional for a state supreme court to equalized funding amidst poor kids and rich kidsAnswer A16 . In the Bakke (1978 ) case the Supreme Court held that all racial classifications violate the Equal security system clause of the Fourteenth AmendmentAnswer A17 . Cases subsequent to Bakke illustrate that all racial preferences in the awarding of government contracts are unconstitutionalAnswer A18 . The University of Michigan undergraduate and law school admissions cases illustrate how difficult it is to create affirmative action programs that do not impact non-minority studentsAnswer A19 . Although there is a recognised executive privilege , it has been judged to be limited and not absoluteAnswer A20 . The Nixon case stands for the proposition that even presidents are not to a higher place the lawAnswer A...If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay